Motorola Xoom Mz604 (1GB + 32GB) Recensione | 168 Dati a confronto

Channel Futures reviews the Motorola Xoom as a potential, albeit imperfect, professional tool capable of replacing netbooks for certain business applications, highlighting the 10.1-inch display and Android Movie Studio app as key assets. Notable advantages include superior, expandable storage via a microSD slot and seamless, automatic synchronization with existing Android smartphone data. Conversely, the tablet is hindered by stability issues, specifically recurring system freezes, poor video conferencing quality, and limited availability of crucial, non-Apple accessories like specific keyboards.

The Motorola Xoom (Wi-Fi only) is recognized by PCMag as a significant milestone, featuring the advanced Android 3.0 Honeycomb OS, a 1GHz dual-core Nvidia Tegra 2 processor, and 1GB of RAM for brisk performance. The tablet boasts a 10.1-inch, 1280x800 display, dual cameras with a 5-megapixel rear sensor, and HDMI output, along with essential Adobe Flash support for improved web browsing. However, the review highlights drawbacks including lack of microSD support at launch, a limited app ecosystem, an overly complex interface, and a heavier, bulkier design compared to competitors. For more details, visit PCMag UK.

The Guardian's 2011 review of the Motorola Xoom highlights a solid 10.1-inch design with a 16:9 aspect ratio, though it is heavier than the iPad 2 and features an awkwardly placed, recessed power button. While the Android 3.0 Honeycomb software offers superior cloud synchronization, it suffers from a confusing interface, a lack of tablet-optimized apps, and difficult screen dimensions for typing. Despite decent battery life without Flash, the tablet's poor native video support and unpolished experience lead to a conclusion that it loses to the iPad.

The Motorola Xoom, as reviewed by Expert Reviews, is notable for being the first tablet to launch with Android 3.0 Honeycomb, featuring a 10.1-inch 1,280x800 display, a 1GHz dual-core Nvidia Tegra 2 processor, and 1GB of RAM. Key pros include a superior 16:9 aspect ratio for media, excellent battery life, and a responsive interface with rich Google services integration, though it is notably heavier and thicker than competitors. However, significant drawbacks included a high launch price, limited initial app availability, and rushed software features like non-functional microSD support at launch.

The Motorola Xoom, launching with Android 3.0 Honeycomb, featured robust hardware—including a Tegra 2 processor and 10.1-inch screen—but felt industrial and heavy compared to the iPad. While the UI offered advanced multitasking, the initial, unpolished software was marred by frequent app crashes and a limited, optimized app library. Performance-wise, the device excelled in hardware-accelerated browsing and connectivity via a micro-HDMI port, though it was hampered by a non-functional MicroSD slot and missing Flash support at launch. Ultimately, the review characterized the Xoom as a "developer's dream" and a "consumer's gamble," providing strong technical capability that was overshadowed by a high price and a fragmented, "beta-feeling" ecosystem.

Gizmodo’s 2011 review described the Motorola Xoom as a fast, powerful, yet unfinished "cold" device that acted as a "vaguely foreboding" first step for Android 3.0 tablets, notes. While the Nvidia Tegra 2 processor provided excellent performance, the hardware was considered heavy and the software felt rushed to market with a limited app ecosystem. Key pros highlighted included the high-resolution 10.1-inch display and reliable all-day battery life. However, significant cons included a poorly placed power button on the back, a lack of promised 4G functionality at launch, and an unoptimized "fingerprint factory" screen. Ultimately, the review deemed the Xoom a device for early adopters rather than general users, concluding that waiting for software updates and broader application support was advisable. For more details, visit Gizmodo.

The Motorola Xoom, reviewed by MobileTechReview, launched as a high-powered 10.1-inch tablet featuring a 1280 x 800 display, a 1GHz Nvidia Tegra 2 processor, and 1GB of RAM. It debuted with Android 3.0 Honeycomb, providing a tablet-optimized interface with superior web browsing, widgets, and 12-hour+ battery life. While lauded for its solid build and 4G LTE upgradability, the device was criticized for being rushed to market, initially lacking functional microSD support, Adobe Flash, and being heavier and more expensive than competitors.

The ZDNet review describes the Motorola Xoom as a high-quality, "half-baked" first step for Android tablets, highlighting its solid build, high-resolution screen, and dual-core processor as pros, while citing weight and screen reflectivity as cons. While Android 3.0 Honeycomb offers an improved, tablet-specific interface, the software feels unrefined, suffering from app instability and a severe lack of tablet-optimized applications, essentially making early users beta testers. Despite its advanced hardware and future-proofed 4G LTE, the Xoom's high $800 price point, coupled with its unpolished software experience, makes it a risky investment compared to competitors, according to the review.

Shelly Palmer’s February 2011 review describes the Motorola Xoom as a powerful, technical alternative to the iPad rather than a direct competitor. While praising the hardware, including two cameras and a future-proof 4G upgrade, Palmer notes the $800 device requires a deeper understanding of computer metaphors to navigate. The review highlights Android 3.0 Honeycomb as a beautifully redesigned operating system tailored for tablets, yet identifies significant drawbacks due to the device feeling "rushed to market". Cons included frequent "force quits," lack of Flash support at launch, and a screen that was a major "fingerprint magnet". Ultimately, Palmer advised waiting for software bugs to be ironed out, calling the Xoom an "awesome" future product that was not quite ready for the mainstream upon release.

The CNET review of the Motorola Xoom (Wi-Fi) highlights it as the first tablet to feature Android 3.0 (Honeycomb), praising its "smoking fast" performance, high-quality 10.1-inch screen, and superior virtual keyboard. Key drawbacks include a high price, bulky design, and lower screen brightness compared to the iPad 2, which hinders outdoor use. While considered the best iPad alternative for early adopters, the Xoom's appeal is limited by its premium cost and a less intuitive, "read-the-manual" software experience for new users. CNET

The Motorola Xoom, reviewed by TechRadar, is a powerful, pioneer tablet featuring Android 3.0 (Honeycomb), a 10.1-inch 1280x800 display, and a 1GHz dual-core Nvidia Tegra 2 processor. Key pros include exceptional multitasking capabilities, a robust hardware suite with dual cameras, and solid 10-hour battery life. However, significant drawbacks, or cons, include a lack of tablet-optimized apps, an "oddly rectangular" design, and a screen that lacks an oleophobic coating, making it a "dirt and grease magnet". Additionally, the Xoom launched with inactive microSD and 4G features, requiring future updates. While deemed the "best Android tablet" at launch, its high price and rushed, heavy, 730g build made it a tough competitor to the iPad 2, with the device being more of a promise for future potential rather than a polished, immediate experience.